RESOURCE-BASED VIEW:
Resource-based view refers to the
strategic analysis of an organization in terms of its competitiveness and
superior performance that is made clear by the help of the distinction of the
organizational capabilities and features. Here, more focus is given to the
comparative competitive advantages as well as how a firm performs better than
others and maintains uniqueness in the particular industry. First the resources
that an organization has and the competencies that the organization does the
best is analyzed. (Zack,
Developing a Knowledge Strategy, 1999)
1.
Physical
resources
2.
Financial
resources
3.
Human
resources
4.
Intellectual
resources
The physical resources refer to
the machinery, buildings etc. the financial resources refer to the cash supply,
capital, shareholders, bankers, etc. the human resources refer to skills,
knowledge, employees, number and mix of people, etc. the intellectual resources
refer to the brands, patents, etc.
Then, the core competencies are
analyzed as well and they are:
1.
Functional
capability
2.
Internal
linkages/ cross functional capabilities
3.
External
linkages
4.
Management
capabilities
5.
Specialized
capabilities
The functional capabilities would
be marketing, procurement capabilities, etc. the internal linkages would be the
links between the sales and procurement, the product development capabilities,
etc. the external linkages would be the capability to develop strong supplier
relations as well as the distributor relationships. The management capability
would be the capability to train, develop a career and knowledge. The
specialized capability would be the distinctiveness from others i.e. what are
the differentials for the firm.
The internal analysis can be
undertaken with the help of the internal information as well as the cooperation
with the staff. I would apply the resource based view to know the core
competencies as well as the resource view so that I can analyze the
distinctiveness of the firm. I would also do a SWOT and PESTLE analysis to
understand the internal as well as external factors that affect the firm. Then
I would also do a VRIN analysis to find out the value perceived by the
customers, rarity, inimitability and the non substitutability of the firm’s
products. And finally I would perform a 7s framework so that the idea of the
performance of the firm in terms of hard as well as soft factors.
The information can be accessed
through the secondary sources, annual business report, websites, etc.
Talking about the group video, our
group members are:
Raksha Limbu
Priyanka Pandey
Sandeep Maharjan
We are working on the idea and we
have a plan to work on the Google. We have started the research on the
information and this weekend we are planning to complete the analysis for
Google.
The stages of group would be:
1.
Forming
2.
Storming
3.
Norming
4.
Performing
5.
Evaluating
We are
at the 4th stage as the works have been already divided to the
members of the group and we have already started performing our parts by
searching for the information necessary to undertake the analysis. So, we are
doing well so far.References:
Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California
Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, Spring,, 125-145.



No comments:
Post a Comment